<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwiz.co.uk/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>BullCharts : RSC</title>
  <link>http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; BullCharts : BullCharts discussion : RSC</description>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006-2009 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
  <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 14:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 10:22:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.69</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=84</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>RSC : davkell, Our relative strength...</title>
   <link>http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=84&amp;PID=325#325</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3" rel="nofollow">Peter</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 84<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 04&nbsp;Jan&nbsp;2005 at 10:22am<br /><br />davkell,<br>Our relative strength comparison is calculated by dividing the price ofone security by another. This means that the point where both pricesare equal is at 1, not zero. This is the method described in TechnicalAnalysis from A to Z by Steve Achelis.The easiest way to add a line iswith the horizontal line tool. <br><br>My Weinstein book seems to have walked for the moment, so I can'tcomment on whether or not he maybe uses a different RSC method.<br><br>Deakan,<br>Yes, that's correct. <img src="http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/smileys/smiley20.gif" border="0"><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 10:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=84&amp;PID=325#325</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>RSC : Thanx Peter,found scale on left...</title>
   <link>http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=84&amp;PID=310#310</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=52" rel="nofollow">Decan_Frost</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 84<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27&nbsp;Dec&nbsp;2004 at 10:43pm<br /><br /><P>Thanx Peter,found scale on left and now makes better sense.</P><P>VCR was my comparing.</P><P>So does it mean that an overlay of the sector on a chart can move&nbsp;down while the RSC moves up,as this is a reflection to how well the share ,security is doing compared to sector.</P><P>Thanx !<IMG style="WIDTH: 26px; HEIGHT: 27px" height=50 src="http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/smileys/smiley4.gif" width=78 border="0"></P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 22:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=84&amp;PID=310#310</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>RSC : Peter; Is it possible to have...</title>
   <link>http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=84&amp;PID=305#305</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=50" rel="nofollow">davkell</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 84<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 24&nbsp;Dec&nbsp;2004 at 1:08pm<br /><br /><P>Peter;</P><P>Is it possible to have the ability to put in the zero line on the RSC? Also, I haven't got the complete understanding of this tool yet, but the version on BullCharts appears a little different to that of the RSC as outlined in Weinstein's book. His axis values appear to go from zero up or down in increments of five (5). Is this just a manipulation of the axis for better viewing or something else?</P><P>Am I right in the understanding that if the RSC is above zero and rising, then the stock price is performing better than the index, and if the RSC is below zero and falling, it is performing worse than the index?</P><P><IMG src="http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/smileys/smiley5.gif" border="0"></P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2004 13:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=84&amp;PID=305#305</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>RSC : Yes, the RSC is used for this...</title>
   <link>http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=84&amp;PID=301#301</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=3" rel="nofollow">Peter</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 84<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 23&nbsp;Dec&nbsp;2004 at 11:25am<br /><br />Yes, the RSC is used for this purpose.<br><br>The RSC is currently unavailable in BullScan or BullScript. However, asfar as we know, the RSC for charts works fine. Which security were youcomparing to XHJ? (and what about the result suggests to you that itmay be incorrect).<br><br>Note: A common mistake people make with the RSC is to not look at theaxis. For example, if you set up an RSC comparing the XAO and the XJOthen you'd expect the two to be very similar. At first glance the RSCgraph appears to be very noisy. However, when you look at the scale,the values are between 0.98 and 1.005 - so it is actually quite flat,but the auto-scaling stretches the tiny bumps out to being quite large.Is it possible that you're observing a similar effect with yourcomparison?<br><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=84&amp;PID=301#301</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>RSC : This i,m led to believe is a comparison...</title>
   <link>http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=84&amp;PID=295#295</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=52" rel="nofollow">Decan_Frost</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 84<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 22&nbsp;Dec&nbsp;2004 at 1:58pm<br /><br /><P>This i,m led to believe is a comparison used manily for say the comparing a stock against it,s sector.</P><P>Am i right in reading somewhere on this site that Bullcharts has had a flaw in relation to RSC,which is being currently worked on.</P><P>As the chart i view via INSERT ,SECURITY,RSC ticked (compared to&nbsp;XHJ HEALTH),does not&nbsp;appear&nbsp;correct.</P><P>This my fellow chartists is quite probably,and statistically,highly possibly&nbsp;my wrong viewing but can someone please explain!.<IMG src="http://www.bullcharts.com.au/Forum/smileys/smiley11.gif" border="0"></P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 13:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bullcharts.com.au/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=84&amp;PID=295#295</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>